FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Acceptability of Intrauterine Enabler Device with Conventional Method of insertion of CuT 380 A: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Comparison of Acceptability of Intrauterine Enabler Device with Conventional Method of insertion of CuT 380 A: A Randomized Controlled Trial - CAIEDCT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/06/025578
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-06-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Insertion of Interval ICUD CuT 380A by Intrauterine Enabler Device (Etherena): Group B will include patients in whom the interval IUCD will be inserted using the Intrauterine Enabler De

Sponsors

Pregna International Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women opting for interval intrauterine device Cu T 380 A as a method of contraception

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients opting for post abortion, post placental IUCD, postpartum IUCD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare client and provider acceptability after insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device IUCD CuT 380A by two methodsTimepoint: Patient enrolment and data collection : 7 months Final report : 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare client comfort and perception after insertion of ntrauterine contraceptive device IUCD CuT 380A by two methods 2. Compare fundal placement of intrauterine devices by ultrasonographyTimepoint: 1 year—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactlatika chawla

AIIMS, Rishikesh

latika.c@rediffmail.com9013074659

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026