Skip to content

Ridge augmentation done for bone defects using a combination of platelet concentrate and graft material.

Evaluating The Efficacy of Sticky Bone In Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with and without membrane: A Randomized Parallel arm Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/06/025567
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-06-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K063- Horizontal alveolar bone loss

Interventions

Intervention1: Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: Horizontal Ridge Augmentation procedure using sticky bone with collagen membrane. Control Intervention1: Horizontal ridge augmentation: Horizontal ridge a

Sponsors

Jane BelindaT
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are between 18-60 years of age. 2. All sites had to be healed sites, that is at least 6 months of post extraction healing was required. 3. Each site bordered by at least one tooth. 4. Single edentulous sites were the treatment planned to receive a dental implant that was evaluated to have inadequate horizontal dimensions for implant placement and classified as either Seibert Class I or III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Debilitating systemic diseases or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on wound healing. 2. History of intravenous bisphosphonate use or oral bisphosphonate use for >3 years 3. Smokers. 4. Pregnancy or lactation 5. Known allergy to any material or medication used in the study. 6. Any Previous History of head and neck radiation therapy 7. Chemotherapy in the last 12 months 8. Severe psychologic problems 9. Failed to sign an informed consent approved by the Human Studies Committee.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary clinical outcome variable is evaluated based on the crestal horizontal ridge width.Timepoint: 1.baseline 2.6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Changes in Vertical Bone Height Dimension 2.Comparison of Horizontal ridge width dimensions between Group I and Group II, 3.Changes in Vertical Height Dimensions between the Group I and Group II 4.Changes in Vestibular Depth 5.Changes in width of keratinized tissue within groups and between groupsTimepoint: 1.baseline 2.6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr P Harinath

SRM Dental college

hari_feb14@hotmail.com9840482400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026