FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between two supraglottic airway devices i.e i-gel and LMA supreme about how easy they are use and manage airway in patients having difficult airway undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

I-GEL vs SUPREME LMA: A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICES IN AIRWAY MANAGEMENT OF MPS III/IV PATIENTS COMING FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/06/025534
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-06-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K802- Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Control Intervention1: I-gel,LMA supreme: Comparing above mentioned devices regarding insertion time,Airway leak pressure,hemodynamic responsive and oropharyngeal trauma

Sponsors

Indira Gandhi medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients giving consent for participating in the study. Patients with the age of 18- 50 years who are ASA I and weighing between 50-70 kg coming for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy having MPS 3/4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having abnormal airway anatomy, tonsillar hypertrophy, hematoma and abscess. History of any condition which increase the risk of regurgitation of gastric contents-Full stomach (less then 8 hours fasting), uncertainty about intake of food or drink Trauma Intra-abdominal pathology like intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, gastric paresis. Diabetes (gastro paresis diabeticorum) Uremia (uremic enteropathy) Esophageal disease like symptomatic reflux motility disorder Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) 2) To compare and evaluate ease and success of airway management with these two devices with respect to total time taken for insertion, number of attempts and failure rate. To compare the airway seal pressures of two devices.Timepoint: Insertion time-After induction of patient Airway seal pressure- 2 minutes after insertion of device—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) 2) 3) To compare hemodynamic response to insertion of i-gel and LMA supreme. To check whether pneumoperitoneum causes leak with these supraglottic airways To compare the incidence of oropharyngeal trauma and of sore throat and hoarseness postoperatively among patients of both the groups.Timepoint: Hemodynamic response- Heart rate,MAP is recorded during first 7 minutes every minute after insertion Leak after Pneumoperitoneum- checked after pneumoperitoneum around 10 minutes after insertion Oropharyngeal trauma- checked after removal of device Sorethroat,Hoarseness of voice - checked after 24 hours postoperatively in ward—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrAnil Kumar Y R

Dept of Anaesthesiology and critical care, Indira Gandhi medical college,Shimla

kartik.syal@gmail.com9418485155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026