TO COMPARE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY BLOCKBUSTER WITH INTUBATING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR INTUBATION

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY BLOCKBUSTER VERSUS INTUBATING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR INTUBATION

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/05/025470

Enrollment

Registered

2020-05-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA 1 & 2) patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with cardiovascular diseases 2. Risk of aspiration pneumonitis e.g, pregnant patients, history of gastro-oesophageal reflux 3. Obesity (Body Mass Index > 30kg/metre square

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken for successful tracheal intubation by Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway Timepoint: Time taken after achieving adequate ventilation by both airway devices to time taken to achieve successful tracheal intubation by both Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Time taken for successful insertion of airway device 2.Number of attempts for successful insertion 3.Haemodynamic changes following intubation 4. Time taken for removal of ILMA/Blockbuster LMATimepoint: 1. Time taken for insertion of device 2. Succesful insertion is from insertion of device to achieving adequate ventilation 3 Haemodynamic changes following intubation at 1,2,3,4,5,10 and 15th minute 4.Time taken to successfully remove the primmer airway device with tracheal tube in-situ	—

Measure

Time frame

1.Time taken for successful insertion of airway device 2.Number of attempts for successful insertion 3.Haemodynamic changes following intubation 4. Time taken for removal of ILMA/Blockbuster LMATimepoint: 1. Time taken for insertion of device 2. Succesful insertion is from insertion of device to achieving adequate ventilation 3 Haemodynamic changes following intubation at 1,2,3,4,5,10 and 15th minute 4.Time taken to successfully remove the primmer airway device with tracheal tube in-situ

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKIRTI NATH SAXENA

DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIA,MAULANA AZAD MEDI

kirtinath@gmail.com9968604215

Outcome results