FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare CuT insertion immediately after delivery of baby to the traditional interval insertion

Post placental intrauterine Cut device (IUCD) versus interval IUCD: A prospective comparative study at a tertiary care centre in Uttarakhand, India"

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/05/025357
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-05-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Dr Kavita Khoiwal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women who are willing for post-placental or interval IUCD insertion and comply with the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: woman who has any contraindication for post-placental IUCD insertion, like chorioamnionitis, prolonged rupture of membranes >18 hours, puerperal sepsis and unresolved post-postpartum haemorrhage. Woman who has contraindication for interval IUD insertion, namely pregnancy, active genital infection, uncontrolled blood sugar or genital malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
acceptability rate, expulsion rate and incidence and distribution of complicationsTimepoint: 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Perception of pain (VAS score) at the time of IUCD insertion and satisfaction levelTimepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kavita Khoiwal

AIIMS Rishikesh

kavita.kh27@gmail.com09690396908

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026