COMPARISON OF RATE OF TOOTH MOVEMENT USING MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE OF MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATION AND PIEZOCISION WITHOUT RAISING FLAP FOLLOWED BY LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY IN UPPER JAW - A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL

COMPARISON OF RATE OF TOOTH MOVEMENT DURING INDIVIDUAL CANINE RETRACTION USING FLAPLESS MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATION AND PIEZOCISION ASSISTED BY LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY - A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/05/025252

Enrollment

Registered

2020-05-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: ACCELERATE ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT: COMPAREMICRO-OSTEOPERFORATION AND PIEZOCISION TECHNIQUES ASSISSTED BY LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY Intervention2: MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATION ASSISSTED BY L

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Both male and female patients in the age group of 16-35 years. 2.Subjects requiring right and left upper first premolar extraction followed by bilateral canine retraction as a part of orthodontic treatment. 3.Probing depth values not exceeding 3mm across the entire dentition. 4.Adequate thickness of the attached gingiva (1-2mm) 5.No radiographic evidence of bone loss.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.History of previous orthodontic treatment. 2.Periodontally compromised patients. 3.Medically compromised patients or patients with systemic disease that might have affected bone formation or density such as osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism or vitamin D deficiency. 4.Patients on any kind of long term medication. 5.Subjects indicated for extraction of any tooth other than first premolars for orthodontic treatment. 5.Patients with unilateral chewing/ parafunctional habits, crossbites and occlusal interferences. 6.Impacted canine or canine with dilacerated roots.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
TO COMPARE BETTER CHOICE OF METHOD FOR ACCELERATING TOOTH MOVEMENT WITH AN ADDITIONAL ADJUNCT LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPYTimepoint: Assessment:0 day after 1 month after 2 month laser dosage pre-surgical laser dose immediately after the procedure of micro-osteoperforation and piezocision day3,4,5 -Analgesic protocol of laser day-7,14,28,56-Healing protocol of laser	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
TO COMPARE BETTER CHOICE OF METHOD FOR ACCELERATING TOOTH MOVEMENT WITH AN ADDITIONAL ADJUNCT LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPYTimepoint: Assessment:0 day after 1 month after 2 month laser dosage pre-surgical laser dose immediately after the procedure of micro-osteoperforation and piezocision day3,4,5 -Analgesic protocol of laser day-7,14,28,56-Healing protocol of laser	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAARTI ANANT SETHIA

KLE VISHWANATH KATTI INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, BELAGAVI

anand_ortho@yahoo.co.in9845857686

Outcome results