Skip to content

A study to compare efficacy of ablation of genicular nerve using electric current with genicular nerve block using injection in patients with pain in knee and to assess improvement in pain, patient satisfaction and complications in both.

A study to compare radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve with genicular nerve block in patients with osteoarthritis knee

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/05/025118
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-05-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M179- Osteoarthritis of knee, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Flouroscope guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve using RF electrode to a temperature of 60 degree for 120 seconds: Patient will be administered flouroscope guided radiofreq

Sponsors

Anaesthesia and critical care department
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Sixty patients of either sex and age more than 50 years attending Pain Clinic fulfilling following three criteria will be included in the study: history, physical examination and pain pattern consistent with osteoarthritis of knee; X-ray knee joint findings corresponding with the patientâ??s clinical symptoms, failure to respond to six weeks of conservative treatment, not willing for surgery or waiting for surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known contraindications for genicular nerve block or intra-articular knee injection; history of adverse reactions to local anaesthetics,steroids; previous history of genicular nerve block or intra-articular injection of knee,arthroscopic lavage and debridement of the knee joint; previous knee surgery,meniscal tear, tendon damage, patient suffering from decompensated heart failure, pneumonia, dementia, rheumatological disorder and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.) Pain score Timepoint: 1.) 1/2 hour 2.) 2 weeks 3.) 1 month 4.) 2 months 5.) 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.) Patient satisfaction 2.) The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities(WOMAC) Index of OsteoarthritisTimepoint: 1.) 1/2 hour 2.) 2 weeks 3.) 1 month 4.) 2 months 5.) 3 months after the procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSukriti Bansal

Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

doc.sukriti@gmail.com8650132353

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026