Skip to content

Comparison of two different methods of alveolar bone preservation following tooth extraction

Comparison of two different methods of socket preservation following tooth extraction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/05/025065
Enrollment
18
Registered
2020-05-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Allograft and collagen membrane: Socket preservation with allograft(colograft) and collagen membrane (cologuide) Intervention2: Collagen membrane: Socket preservation done with collagen

Sponsors

AMRITA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All anterior and premolar teeth extraction cases in which patients who are planned to receive implants/FPD in future, non- smoker, satisfactory periodontal status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Uncontrolled systemic disorders, immuno- compromised patients, known allergic cases for allograft and collagen membrane, pregnant and lactating women, un co-operative patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Alveolar bone height and widthTimepoint: Baseline, 1 month and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not applicableTimepoint: Not applicable

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAkhila K

Amrita vidyapeetham university

dr.ravi.omfs@gmail.com8848061098

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026