FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the outcome of Damon and MBT prescription.

Clinical efficiency of Damon and MBT prescriptions:A prospective comparative study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/05/025016
Enrollment
34
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z008- Encounter for other general examination

Interventions

Intervention1: Damon self ligating appliance.: A slef ligating appliance which claims to give better treatment outcomes compare to the conventional MBT appliance. Intervention2: Damon self ligating ap

Sponsors

Moushomi Paul
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Non extraction cases 2. Mild to moderate crowding or spacing 3. No history of previous orthodontic treatment 4. Fully erupted permanent dentition excluding third molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Congenitally missing teeth 2.Orthopedic expansion 3.Skeletal anchorage 4.Prosthetically rehabilitated patients 5. Periodontally compromised patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in inclination of teeth in degrees in terms of tip and torque values.Anchor loss values in millimetres.Timepoint: Change in inclination of teeth in degrees in terms of tip and torque values.Anchor loss values in millimetres IN 24 Weeks.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expansion of arches in millimetres.Timepoint: 24months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMoushomi Paul

KLE Societys Institute Of Dental Sciences

aravindorthodoc@gmail.com9886111436

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026