Skip to content

Attempting to pass a breathing tube in a model of human body using two different preventive device as a precautionary measure in the times of COVID

Comparative Evaluation of Intubation Performances Using Two Different Barrier Devices in the COVID era: A Manikin Based Pilot Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/05/024985
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-05-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Anaesthesiologists with experience of greater than 3 years (post MD)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate Previous training using similar barrier devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for successful endotracheal intubationTimepoint: Time taken for successful endotracheal intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 First pass success rate using either of the barrier devices 2 Subjective ease of performing endotracheal intubation 3 Manoeuvres required to perform successful intubation 4 Feedback of the operator regarding the performance of each of the barrier enclosures Timepoint: After completion of successful endotracheal intubation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rudrashish Haldar

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

rudrashish@yahoo.com09256543256

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026