Skip to content

Use of local anaesthesia for post operative pain management in cleft palate surgery

Comparative evaluation of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine for post operative pain management in palatal surgeries- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/04/024906
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-04-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Q359- Cleft palate, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Bupivacaine hydrochloride injection IP 0.5%: Bupivacaine hydrochloride injection IP 0.5% (ANAWIN) Control Intervention1: Ropivacaine hydrochloride injection IP 0.75%: Ropivacaine hydroc

Sponsors

Saveetha Dental College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing the following surgery 1.primary palatoplasty 2.secondary palatoplasty 3.re-surgery for palatal fistula closure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing the following surgery 1. Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To identify any difference between post operative pain management with Bupivacaine hydrochloride injection and Ropivacaine hydrochloride injectionTimepoint: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post operatively

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative pain managementTimepoint: Post operative pain at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Madhulaxmi M

Saveetha Dental College

madhulaxmi11@gmail.com7373814000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026