Skip to content

A comparison of propofol versus dexmedetomidine in ERCP patients

A comparison between continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in patients undergoing Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/04/024711
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-04-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 2: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 3: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: Dexmedetomidine infusion: Infusion of dexmedetomidine, 1 mcg/kg/min over 10 minsfollowed by 0.5mcg/kg/h for achieving satisfactory sedation during ERCP Control Intervention1: Propofol i

Sponsors

Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with ASA I to III, belonging to age group 18-65 years scheduled for elective ERCP procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Duration of procedure >2 hours 2. Severe Cardiac, Pulmonary, CNS and Renal disorders 3. Allergic to study medications. 4.Habituation to Sedative drugs. 5. Morbid obesity. 6.Refusal to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken to achieve satisfactory sedation Ramsay sedation Score (RSS 3-4) using an infusion of dexmedetomidine versus propofol infusionTimepoint: Start of infusion until RSS of 3-4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Number of times additional boluses are administered and dosing needed. 2.To note the time taken for recovery (from discontinuation of the study drug till achieving Modified Aldrete Score 9-10 3. To look for incidence ofadverse effects hypotension (SBPâ?¤90mm Hg), bradycardia (HRâ?¤50 bpm), desaturation (SpO2â?¤92 for 10sec) and apnoea (no spontaneous breaths for 10sec) and any interventions. 4. To assess patient and endoscopist satisfaction by a scoring system . Timepoint: Points in time needing additional intervention during the procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrRoopa Manchinabele Nagabhushan

Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences ad Research Centre

lakshmi.k.238@gmail.com9496211333

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026