Skip to content

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PROPERTIES OF TWO DIFFERENT WIRES

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FRICTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO ARCHWIRE MATERIALS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/04/024709
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-04-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Titanium niobium tantalum zirconium archwire: Used for initial alignment of arches for 6-8 months Control Intervention1: Copper nickel titanium archwire: Used for initial alignment of a

Sponsors

SNEHA R ISMAIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Littles irregularity index 2-4 mm Patients with no history of orthodontic treatment Confirmation that all permanent teeth were fully erupted from 2nd molar to 2nd molar No history of trauma to periodontium

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known allergy to nickel or to any other metal History of long term drug uses History of any systemic diseases Abnormal chewing habits Patients with proximal caries or restorations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There will be difference in mechanical parameters between two archwire wires in as received stateTimepoint: 6 months (24 weeks)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There will be difference in mechanical parameters between two archwire soldiers after initial alignmentTimepoint: 8 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSNEHA R ISMAIL

PMS COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH

madhavmanoj@gmail.com9847318768

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026