To find out ease of placing a device at voice box by putting it with finger or passing it with a soft tube

Usefulness of bougie preloaded Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus digital insertion technique in correct placement of the device

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/04/024576

Enrollment

Registered

2020-04-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C509- Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified site

Interventions

Intervention1: Soft gum elastic bougie: One group of patients airway will be secured with proseal preloaded with soft gum elastic bougie Control Intervention1: Proseal without bougie: One group of pat

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Surgical patients requiring general anesthesia using Proseal. 2. ASA physical status 1-3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Obesity, 2. hiatus hernia, 3. pregnancy, 4. full stomach, 5. diabetics, 6. restricted mouth opening

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare number of attempts taken for correct placement of Proseal using bougie preloaded Proseal as compared to traditional digital insertion technique.Timepoint: 1 min after securing airway	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Assessment of ease of insertion of Proseal, time taken for it, hemodynamic responses during procedure, evidence of trauma as evidenced by blood stained secretions or blood on Proseal while removing at end of the surgery.Timepoint: 1,3,5,10 min after securing airway	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSunil Rajan

Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences

karthikcbi@gmail.com9447775626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026