FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare two different methods intravenous drug fluid and nutrition therapy

PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO COMPARE PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS LINE VERSUS CENTRAL TRIPLE LUMEN CATHETER IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROTOMY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/04/024481
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-04-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system Health Condition 3: N00-N99- Diseases of the genitourinary system

Interventions

Intervention1: N/A: N/A Intervention2: central triple lumen catheter: central tirple lumen cathater insertaaed in ijv or subclavian veins Control Intervention1: N/A: N/A

Sponsors

Department of General Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All the patients between age of 18 to 80

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients below age of 18 Pregnant women Patients with coagulation disorders Patients above age of 80 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mechanical complications of I.v line Infectious complications of intravenous lineTimepoint: 2days 1 week 2 week 1 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of cross over due to impossibility of inserting/maintaining peripheral intravenous lineTimepoint: 1day 1week—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ketan Prajapati

Government Medical College, Bhavnagar

somanirajan@yahoo.in9825572796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026