FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative study between etomidate infusion versus propofol infusion as maintenance of anesthesia for pulse and blood pressure(hemodynamic) stability and recovery in laproscopic surgeries

Comparative study between etomidate infusion versus propofol infusion as maintenance of anesthesia for hemodynamic stability and recovery in laproscopic surgeries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/04/024463
Enrollment
48
Registered
2020-04-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: inj.etomidate: inj.etomidate at 0.2 to 0.6 mg/kg/min as induction dose followed by 10mcg/kg/min as maintenance dose intravenous infusion Control Intervention1: inj.propofol: inj.propofo

Sponsors

Pramukhswami Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.hypersensitivity to active substances or its active excipients 2.renal insufficiency 3.patients with history of convulsion 4.hypovolemic patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to see for hemodynamic stability and recoveryTimepoint: hemodynamic stability-in terms of blood pressure and pulse for every 5minutes in 1st half an hour followed by 10minutes interval till the surgery is over recovery in terms of eye opening on command in seconds—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
requirement of inhalational agentsTimepoint: for every 15minutes till the surgery is over—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShraddha Trivedi

Pramukhswami medical college

shraddhatrivedi6@gmail.com9574013888

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026