Skip to content

Flapless versus Flap technique for dental implant placement

Comparative evaluation of Crestal bone loss after one year of implant placement with Flapless versus flap surgery using surgical template after immediate loading in the posterior mandibular region using CBCT: A Randomized controlled trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/04/024424
Enrollment
32
Registered
2020-04-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Intervention 1: Immediate implant loading with Flap surgery in posterior mandible region. Intervention 2: Immediate implant loading with Flapless surgery in posterior mandible region.Fl

Sponsors

Dr Sayali Dandekar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Patient between 18-45 years of age. b) Philosophical patient signing informed consent. c) Patients fit for minor surgical procedures. d) Healthy periodontal condition. e) Partially edentulous patients missing one tooth scheduled for implant supported restoration. f) Suf�cient dimensions of alveolar ridge to place implant of minimum diameter 4 mm and length 10mm. g) Presence of tripodal occlusal contact of natural teeth. h) Equal number of male and female patients will be included in the study. i) Implants will be placed in healthy healed socket. j) Antagonist teeth should be healthy and non-restored tooth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) General contraindications to implant surgery. b) Irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year previously. c) Poor oral hygiene and motivation. d) Untreated periodontal disease. e) Pregnancy or lactation f) Substance abuse. g) Psychiatric problems. h) Lack of opposing occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement. i) Severe bruxism or clenching. j) Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement. k) Need for bone augmentation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic outcome-crestal bone loss after one year of implant placementTimepoint: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
noneTimepoint: none

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Krishankumar Lahoti

Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital Wanadongri Road Hingna Nagpur

kk.lahoti@sdk-dentalcollege.edu.in9763711501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026