FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparative study of Morphine v/s nalbuphine along with Bupivacaine given via spinal route in laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries

A comparative study of intrathecal morphine v/s nalbuphine along with bupivacaine in laproscopic gynaecological procedures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/03/024314
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-03-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N852- Hypertrophy of uterus

Interventions

Intervention1: Sub arachnoid Block (SAB): SAB will be performed in L2/3 or L3/4 intervertebral space, using a 25 gauge Quinckeâ??s spinal needle, in the sitting position, maintaining aseptic precautio

Sponsors

Dr Durga Jethava
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient fulfilling criteria of American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) of Classes I/ II/ III. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries. Patientâ??s giving consent willingly.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA CLASS IV & V. Patient refusal. Allergy to study medications, infection at the site. Anatomic abnormalities, coagulation disorders. Inability to comprehend or participate in pain scoring system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intrathecal nalbuphine is more efficacious then morphine for post operative analgesia.Timepoint: Up to 24 hr postoperatively—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Nalbuphine provides a better safety profile than Morphine in the aspect of certain side-effects, especially related to pruritus and respiratory depression. Timepoint: Upto 24 hr post operatively.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vigya Goyal

M.G.M.C.H., Jaipur

djethava@gmail.com9680064336

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026