FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative study of surgeries done for treatment of varicosities in patients of varicose vein patients.

A prospective comparative study of radiofrequency ablation versus subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery for the treatment of varicosities in varicose vein patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/03/024298
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-03-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I838- Varicose veins of lower extremities with other complications

Interventions

Intervention1: Radiofequency ablation: This technique uses radiofrequency energy (instead of laser energy) to heat up and damage the wall inside a vein with a temperature of 120 degree centigrade via

Sponsors

Department of General Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Age above 18 years -Patients having both truncal varicosities with perforator incompetencies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Presence of deep vein thrombosis -Patients unfit for surgery/anaesthesia -Patients unwilling for the surgery -Patients with deep venous reflux.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the change in clinical severity of disease after 4 weeks of operation using Venous clinical severity score.Timepoint: 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the rate of complications in RFA vs SEPSTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rana Parth Harajivandas

Government medical college,Bhavnagar

drfirdausd@gmail.com9825133976

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026