FindTrial
Sign In

comparative study between digitally fabricated complete denture and conventional complete denture

EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND ESTHETIC OUTCOMES OF CAD-CAM BALTIC DENTURE AND CONVENTIONAL DENTURE REMOVABLE PROSTHESES - A CROSS OVER RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/03/024165
Enrollment
8
Registered
2020-03-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified Health Condition 2: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: CAD-CAM COMPLETE DENTURE: DIGITALLY FABRICATED COMPLETE DENTURES WILL BE DELIVERED TO THE PATIENT AND OUTCOME MEASURES WILL BE ASSESSED Control Intervention1: CONVENTIONAL COMPLETE DENT

Sponsors

B T Pradeep Raja
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Completely edentulous patients with class I ridge relation, Class I &II ridge morphology (PDI). 2.Adult patients needing new complete dentures 3.Mentally receptiveness 4.Patients able to understand the informed consent 5.Patient who are able to come for 9-10 visits. 6.Absence of dysfunctional disorders of the masticatory system 7.Absence of debilitating systemic diseases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Refusal to participate in the study. 2.Patients with class II and class III ridge relation. 3.Patients with past history of Complete dentures 4.Symptoms of Temporomandibular disorders 5.Patients with severe xerostomia 6.Patients with parafunctional habits 7.Patients with severe oral manifestations of systemic disease 8.Psychologic or psychiatric conditions that could influence response to treatment. 9.Patient asking for implant supported/retained prostheses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Functional outcomes - Blinded evaluation of retention and stability using functional assessment of denture - FAD questionnaire 2.Aesthetic outcomes - blinded evaluation of aesthetics using Frush and Fisher Aesthetics criteria 3.Patient satisfaction 4.Comfort- self evaluation of patients satisfaction and comfort by means of a denture satisfaction questionnaire Timepoint: After one month of each intervention—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
PATIENT QUALITY OF LIFE assessment of patients quality of life (OHRQoL) before and after treatment by means of Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (OHIP19)Timepoint: AFTER ONE MONTH OF EACH INTERVENTION—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactB T Pradeep Raja

Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences

manoharanps@igids.ac.in9865019673

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026