FindTrial
Sign In

comparison between treatment time of magnetic twin block and conventional twin block in treatment of growing patient with short mandible.

Comparison of the effects of magnetic twin block and conventional twin block in treatment of growing patients with skeletal class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism- A Randomised controlled trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/03/024096
Enrollment
45
Registered
2020-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Magnetic twin block: treatment time and effects of magnetic twin block is compared with conventional clarks twin block Control Intervention1: Clarks conventional twin block: treatment t

Sponsors

Self
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Clinically: 1.No previous history of any orthodontic treatment. 2.Each subject with a full cusp class II or end-on molar relationship bilaterally with convex facial profile. 3.The overjet should not be less than 5mm. 4.VTO improved with anterior positioning of mandible. Radiographically: 1.ANB angle more than 4 degree with favorable functional analysis and favorable growth pattern. 2.Subjects who are at accelerated phase of pubertal growth spurt (CVMI stage-3, MP3-FG and MP3- G stage).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Discrepancy 1.Class I due to Tooth Size Arch Length 2.Excess Lower anterior face height 3.Proclined mandibular incisors. 4.Non-growing individuals 5.Syndromic cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the treatment time of Magnetic Twin Block and Conventional Twin Block in treatment of growing patients with skeletal class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism.Timepoint: treatment duration of magnetic twin block is more/less or equally effective than conventional twin block.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To analyze cephalometrically the skeletal and dental effects of Magnetic Twin Block and Conventional Twin Block with control group.Timepoint: effectiveness of cephalometric changes with magnetic twin block than conventional twin block.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swapnil Prakash Mangwade

Government dental college and hospital,nagpur

drsjchavan@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026