Skip to content

comparison of two types of local anaesthetics intrathecally in ambulatory elective surgery.

Prospective open label randomized trial to compare intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine (heavy)in ambulatory elective surgery.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/03/023710
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-03-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 1% 2-chloroprocaine: Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine (heavy)in ambulatory elective surgery. Control Intervention1: 0.5% bupivacaine(heavy): Intrathecal 1% 2-chlo

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 60 patients of age group 18-60 years posted for infraumblical ambulatory elective surgery of45-60 minutesduration underspinal anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients with contradictions to spinal anaesthesia,cardiac or renal insufficiency,allergic to local anaesthetics or para-aminobenzoic acid, on oral anticoagulant therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to eligibility for discharge,time for complete regression of sensory and motor blockade,time to ambulation and micturitionTimepoint: Time to eligibility for discharge,time for complete regression of sensory and motor blockade,time to ambulation and micturition

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
incidence of hypotension,bradycardia,pain requiring analgesia,postoperative nausea and vomitingTimepoint: single

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Balwinderjit singh

Panjab institute of medical sciences

drbalwinder2000@yahoo.co.in098140-87951

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026