Clinical study on the cosmetic appearance and health of gum tissues around artificial tooth replacement using dental implants with three different technique for replacement of upper front teeth.

Esthetic and survival outcome of three different types of implant placement and provisionalization techniques for preservation of gingival architecture in anterior maxillae-a clinical evaluation.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/03/023695

Enrollment

Registered

2020-03-02

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: 1. Group SS -Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique with PEEK and acrylic provisionals: Thirty patients regardless of gender, indicated for extraction of single maxill

1. Group SS -Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique with PEEK and acrylic provisionals 2. Group EP-Immediate implant placement with patientâ??s own extracted teeth customised as pro

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: INCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Patients coming for implant treatment in the Department of Prosthodontics, Govt. Dental College, Kozhikode and willing to participate in the study. 2. Patients who need single tooth replacement in the anterior maxillary area. 3. Patients of age ranging from 20-50 years with adequate oral hygiene. 4. The tooth has to be extracted for one of the following reasons: horizontal or vertical fracture, destructive caries, internal resorption and endodontic problems not treatable with root canal therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: EXCLUSION CRITERIA. 1. Pregnant and lactating females 2. Patients with poor general health condition like uncontrolled diabetes, with severe immune suppression, undergoing radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy, for head and neck malignancies, autoimmune diseases, patients treated with amino bisphosphonates and long-term steroid therapy. 3. Patients with active periodontitis or acute infection or presence of a fistula and tooth with a grade 2 mobility or more in the area intended for implant placement. 4. Patients who are substance abusers, or with psychiatric problems. 5. Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism, clenching, excessive gum chewing, lip or fingernail biting.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical Evaluation, Esthetic evaluation, Radiologic evaluation, Survival outcomeTimepoint: Base line 6 months one year two years	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Gingival recession, implant failureTimepoint: baseline 6 months one year 2 years	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPramod Kumar A V Dr

Govt. Dental College, Kozhikode (Calicut)

pramodav@hotmail.com9447169055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026