FindTrial
Sign In

A study to know which method is better to prevent fall in blood pressure in cesarean section

Comparison of head elevated position and Inj. Ondansetron in reducing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in elective lower segment caesarean section: an open labeled randomized control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/02/023526
Enrollment
750
Registered
2020-02-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O00-O9A- Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium

Interventions

Intervention1: Inj. Ondansetron and head elevation: Comparison of Inj. Ondansetron or head elevation with control Intervention2: inj Ondansetron: Inj Ondansetron 0.1mg/kg IV single dose, 5 minutes pri

Sponsors

Bangalore Baptist Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Parturients for Cesarean Section

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI >35 ASA3 Severe fetal distress Obstetric complications Medical disease complicating pregnancy Sitting position Drug volume > or Contraindication to spinal anesthesia Allergy to ondansetron Parturients on medicines acting on 5HT3 Conversion to general anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fall in Blood pressureTimepoint: After spinal anesthesia at 1,2,3,4,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 and 60 minute—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Vomiting, maximal sensory block level, bradycardia,Timepoint: After spinal anesthesia at 1,2,3,4,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 and 60 minute—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mita Eunice Sarkar

Bangalore Baptist hospital

mitasarkar7@yahoo.com9980670790

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026