Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: modified piezocision
: piezocision can be performed within the extraction socket and this is modified piezocision method
Control Intervention1: Conventional Piezocision: It combines mi
Sponsors
Neelambari Mohan
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients who are to undergo orthodontic treatment with Fixed Mechanotherapy requiring maxillary and mandibular first premolar extraction and distal movement of the canine ( cases requiring extraction for bimaxillary protrusion and minimal to moderate crowding) Clinically healthy periodontium with no radiographic evidence of bone loss Individuals with full complement of teeth (third molars not included).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients. Patients suffering from any congenital, hereditary or systemic diseases. Chronic use of any medications affecting orthodontic tooth movement (e.g. corticosteroids, hormonal therapy, NSAIDs) Patients with dental anomalies (e.g. enamel hypoplasia, root dilacerations in maxillary canines). Patients not willing to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary objective is to assess the rate of canine retraction following modified Piezocision and conventional piezocisionTimepoint: 3 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The secondary objective is to compare the levels of Tumour Necrosing Factor α (TNF α) following canine retraction using conventional mechanics with extraction, retraction following interproximal reduction, conventional Piezocision and modified Piezocision. Timepoint: 4 pre activation T0, 7 days later T1, after 30 days T2, after 90 days T3 | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactNeelambari Mohan
Sri Ramachandra University
Outcome results
None listed