FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the differences in Musta rhizome obtained from natural and polluted sources

A COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL, PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND HEAVY METAL ANALYSIS OF MUSTA (CYPERUS ROTUNDUS LINN.) RHIZOME OBTAINED FROM NATURAL (PRASHASTHA BHUMI) AND POLLUTED (APRASHASTHA BHUMI) SOURCES

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/02/023216
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-02-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Parul Institute of Ayurved
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy individual between the age group of 18-60 years irrespective of sex are selected.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Upper respiratory and middle ear infections, Head injury, Surgery of the ear, nose, and throat, Poor oral hygiene and dental problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The taste threshold of Musta rhizome will be evaluated.Timepoint: 1 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The taste threshold of Musta rhizome will be identifiedTimepoint: 1 month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Deepika Joshi

Parul Institute of Ayurved

rekhamparmar11@gmail.com9724306523

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026