Comparison of two filling materials for treating decay in primary teeth using hand instruments

Comparative evaluation of a self curing, fluoride releasing, resin based restorative material with the conventional Glass ionomer cement for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment of deciduous molars in outreach programmes - Split mouth design.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/02/023171

Enrollment

Registered

2020-02-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Self-curing, fluoride releasing, resin based restorative Material: An innovative tooth-coloured resin based self-curing, fluoride releasing, chemically bonded restorative material using

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children with at least two cavitated lesions symmetrically distributed one on the left side and another on the right side of the mandibular arch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cavitated lesions with signs of infection Physically and mentally challenged subjects Non-cooperative subjects

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the survival rate of self-curing, fluoride releasing, resin based restorative material with that of glass ionomer cement. Survival rate includes (Retention, Colour match, Marginal discoloration, Marginal Integrity, Marginal caries, Anatomical form, Surface texture) Timepoint: 6, 12,18 and 24 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Survival rate includes (Retention, Colour match, Marginal discoloration, Marginal Integrity, Marginal caries, Anatomical form, Surface texture) Timepoint: 6, 12,18 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRanjitha M

Tamil Nadu Government Dental College & Hospital

mban1965@yahoo.com9840127997

Outcome results