Comparison of pain perception during removal of the fixed orthodontic appliance between conventional and vibratory therapy

Comparison of pain perception during debonding between conventional and vibratory therapy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/01/022947

Enrollment

Registered

2020-01-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M264- Malocclusion, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Customized Low-level vibatory device: Pain reduction using low-level vibratory therapy using customized device on the experimental side Intervention2: Customized low level vibratory dev

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Both males and females aged 14-30 years were included; - Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment using 0.022Ã?0.028 metallic MBT bracket system, (ORMCO California USA).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients who have undergone extraction for orthodontic treatment; - With systemic diseases; - Under medications; - With local infection, periodontal problems, dental pain, or any psychological disorder that might affect the pain threshold level; - With syndromes and genetic problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To assess whether low level vibration reduces pain during debonding.Timepoint: immediately after debonding	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess which arch experiences more pain reductionTimepoint: immediately after debonding	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJanani Jayapal

Meenakshi ammal dental college

umasdental@gmail.com6382264738

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026