FindTrial
Sign In

Clinical Comparison of Preformed Zirconia and Stainless Steel Crowns in Young Permanent Teeth

Comparative Assessment of the Clinical Efficacy in Preformed Zirconia Crown and Stainless Steel Crown in Permanent Molar Teeth in Pediatric Patients- Randomized Prospective Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/01/022801
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-01-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Stainless Steel Crowns: 3m Espe USA Control Intervention1: zirconia: 3 m Espe. Nusmile USA

Sponsors

Dr Abhinav Talekar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: 1) Requirement of placement of crowns on permanent molar after endodontic treatment 2) Teeth required for multi surface restoration followed by crown 3) Permanent second molar is erupting 4) Opposite teeth present

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: 1) Teeth with poor prognosis 2) Patient refused to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Both crowns are having equal clinical performance. Methhodology: MOdified USPHS criteriaTimepoint: One week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Zironia crowns do not affect eruption of second molar Methodology: Intraoral Periapical Radiograph Clinical PictureTimepoint: One week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhinav Talekar

MA Rangoonwala College of Dentistry, Camp,

drabhinavtalekar@gmail.com9503079151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026