Skip to content

Metabolic Surgery

Endoscopic evaluation of Non-banded MGBP vs banded MGBP

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/01/022593
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-01-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: E663- Overweight

Interventions

Intervention1: GERD/Barrettâ??s/Esophagus/Gastritis/Duodenitis/Ulcer: GERD/Barrettâ??s/Esophagus/Gastritis/Duodenitis/Ulce Control Intervention1: Non-banded MGBP vs banded MGBP: Non-banded MGBP vs ban

Sponsors

Mohak Bariatric and Robotics Centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non-banded MGBP vs banded MGBP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Another type of Metabolic procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Weight LossTimepoint: 1yr,2yrs,3yrs,4yrs,5yrs

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Find the comparative percentage of following findings Esophagitis 2. Signs of GERD 3. Barrettâ??s Esophagus 4. Gastritis 5. Duodenitis 6. Ulcer at time periodsTimepoint: 1yr,2yrs,3yrs,4yrs,5yrs

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mohit Bhandari

Mohak Bariatric and Robotics Centre

drmohitbhandari@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026