Skip to content

â??A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF DRUG ABC AND XYZ FOR ARTIFICIAL ONSET OF LABOURâ??

â??A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL(PGE1) WITH INTRACERVICAL DINOPROSTONE (PGE2)GEL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOURâ??

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/12/022565
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-12-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery

Interventions

Intervention1: Misoprostol(PGE1), Dinoprostone(PGE2): Misoprostol (15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16 methyl-PGE1) was the first synthetic prostaglandin analogue to be made available for the treatment of peptic u

Sponsors

Sir T general hospital and goevrnment medical college bhavangar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women with >37weeks of gestation with indication of induction of labour

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Contracted pelvic or cephalopelvic dispropotion,multifetal dispropotion,chromic medical disease,gluoma,asthma,previous scar on uterus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare induction delivery interval with intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gelTimepoint: Time of admission to postpartam 6week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To comapre outcome of induction of labour To comapre fetomaternal outcomeTimepoint: Admission to postpartam 6week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShital

Sir T general hospital and government medical college bhavnagar

kda2308@yahoo.com9925021608

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026