postoperative size of ear canal in canal wall down mastoidectomy

Optimal Meatoplasty In Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/12/022503

Enrollment

Registered

2019-12-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H712- Cholesteatoma of mastoid

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified Portman 2 flap meatoplasty: Patients in this arm will undergo Modified Portman 2 flap meatoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy Control Intervention1: Portman 3 flap meatopl

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: all patients with chronic supparative otitis media(atticoantral type) undergoing canal wall down mastoidectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: all adults with serious comorbidities like diabeties mellitus, hypertension, etc

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
At the end of this study we hope to predict on table optimal size of meatoplasty in relation to size of mastoid cavity for effective post operative healing in chronic otitis media (atticoantral type), the time taken for creation of meatoplasty to meatal opening at the time of cavity healing, time taken for cavity healing and associated complications can be noted. This would predict the optimal size of meatoplasty on table considering size of mastoid cavity.Timepoint: The outcome of the study will be assessed after sample size has been attained in September 2020	—

Measure

Time frame

At the end of this study we hope to predict on table optimal size of meatoplasty in relation to size of mastoid cavity for effective post operative healing in chronic otitis media (atticoantral type), the time taken for creation of meatoplasty to meatal opening at the time of cavity healing, time taken for cavity healing and associated complications can be noted. This would predict the optimal size of meatoplasty on table considering size of mastoid cavity.Timepoint: The outcome of the study will be assessed after sample size has been attained in September 2020

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate which procedure yeilds a dry cavity fasterTimepoint: To evaluate which procedure yeilds a dry cavity faster	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGlynis Florence Francis

Pondicherry Institue of Medical Sciences

glynisffrancis@gmail.com8056599460

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026