FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF EXTRACTION SPACE CLOSURE WITH AND WITHOUT CHANGING ACTIVE TIEBACK

A STUDY OF IN-VIVO EXTRACTION SPACE TOOTH MOVEMENT USING ALTERED AND UNALTERED ACTIVE TIEBACK FORCE ;COMPARING IT WITH IN-VITRO FORCE DEGRADATION

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/12/022473
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-12-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring

Interventions

Control Intervention1: UNALTERED ACTIVE TIEBACK: IN 1ST PREMOLAR EXTRACTION CASE ON CONTROL SIDE WE WILL GIVE ACTIVE TIEBACK FOR SPACE CLOSURE , WHICH WILL NOT BE REPLACED TILL FOUR MONTHS OF TIME PE

Sponsors

DHRUV PATEL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adolescent patient, 14- 25 years of age, with bilateral premolar extractions in the maxillary or the mandibular arch, or in both arches.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. If a subject appeared at his or her appointment with either the unaltered site or the altered site Active tieback broken or missing. 2. If at the unaltered site active tieback was inadvertently removed during the experimental time or the extraction space became closed. 3. If the time between monthly measurements exceeded 33 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
SPACE CLOSURE (IN VIVO) Timepoint: EVERY 28 ±5 DAYS TILL 4 MONTHS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
FORCE DEGRADATION (IN VITRO)Timepoint: EVERY 28 ±5 DAYS TILL 4 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR NIKUNJ PATEL

MANUBHAI PATEL DENTAL COLLEGE

nikunj_84@yahoo.co.in8128460652

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026