Skip to content

Comparison of two ventilation devices for key-hole surgery of gall bladder removal

Efficacy of I-gel and Baska mask for ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/12/022390
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-12-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K802- Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Group B: Baska mask will be inserted into the Oropharynx after induction for ventilation and left in place throughout the surgery until the patient recovers from anesthesia Control Inte

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 18-59 years old belonging to ASA I & II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with difficult airway Increased risk of aspiration BMI >30 Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare oropharyngeal seal pressure of I-Gel and Baska maskTimepoint: Five minutes after placement of I-gel/Baska mask

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare complications such as sore throat, dysphagia and dysphonia in the post operative period between I-gel and Baska maskTimepoint: At 2 hours and 24 hours postoperatively;To compare Brimacombe scoring of I-Gel and Baska maskTimepoint: Ten minutes after placement of I-gel/Baska mask;To compare efficacy of intraoperative ventilation using I-gel and Baska maskTimepoint: From placement of I-gel/Baska mask till end of the surgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVikram M S

St Johns medical college hospital

doc_vikram@yahoo.com9731981665

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026