FindTrial
Sign In

A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING TWO METHODS OF EXTUBATOON READINESS TRIAL (CPAP AND PRESSURE SUPPORT) IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED CHILDREN

PRESSURE SUPPORT VERSUS CPAP FOR EXTUBATION READINESS IN CHILDREN RECEIVING MECHANICAL VENTILATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/12/022328
Enrollment
244
Registered
2019-12-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J00-J99- Diseases of the respiratory system

Interventions

Intervention1: Pressure Support: A mode used for extubation readiness test - 2 hours Control Intervention1: CPAP: A mode used for extubation readiness test - 2 hours

Sponsors

PGIMER Chandigarh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children aged 12 years or younger and receiving mechanical ventilation at least for 48 hours 2. Informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Procedural or short term intubation 2. End of life care 3. Neuromuscular disorders requiring slow or customised weaning plan 4. Prolonged mechanical ventilation >4 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful extubation after first extubation readiness testTimepoint: 72 hours post extubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of PICU stayTimepoint: Till discharge from PICU;Need for post extubation NIVTimepoint: 72 hours post extubation;Rate of re-intubationTimepoint: 72 hours post extubation;Ventilation free daysTimepoint: Till discharge from PICU—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVishwa CR

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

ny.karthi@gmail.com9814376716

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026