FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of three techniques for preoxygenation in adult patients - spontaneous breathing versus ventilator assisted breathing

A study to evaluate efficacy of pressure support ventilation with and without positive end expiratory pressure for preoxygenation in adult patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/12/022326
Enrollment
132
Registered
2019-12-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Pressure support ventilation with and without PEEP for preoxygenation: Pressure support ventilation with and without positive end expiratory pressure during preoxygenation in healthy pa

Sponsors

Dr Mohini Gupta
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA class I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy, bleeding and clotting abnormalities, congenital heart disease, breath holding time <20 seconds

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lesser time for preoxygenation compared to conventional preoxygenation methodTimepoint: Time when SpO2 90%—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Increased safe apnea timeTimepoint: Time until SpO2 falls to 93 % after FeO2 attained 90%—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mohini Gupta

PT.B.D.SHARMA PGIMS, Rohtak

susheelataxak@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026