Comparison of Video-laryngoscope and Direct laryngoscope

A comparative evaluation between Medicam pediatric video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in pediatric patients undergoing tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia- A Randomized Control Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/12/022291

Enrollment

Registered

2019-12-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N433- Hydrocele, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: endotracheal intubation: videolaryngoscope and macintosh comparison Intervention2: Endotracheal intubation: Comparison of Macintosh and medicam video laryngoscope

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA GRADE 1 AND 2 Weight 10 -30 kgs elective surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: anticipated difficult airway congenital anamolies heart disease reactive airway disease metabolic disase

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Intubation TimeTimepoint: Time (in seconds) taken in between the device introduced between two incisors till it removed after endotracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
number of attempts ease of intubation cormack and lehane grading haemodynamic changes traumaTimepoint: 1; 3 and 5 minutes	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAtif Khalid

JN Medical College, AMU

kazmifarah@gmail.com9897067670

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026