Skip to content

Conventional demonstration of mirror therapy versus app based teaching of mirror therapy

A Randomized Control Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Conventional Demonstration of Mirror Therapy Versus App Based Teaching of Mirror Therapy on Functional Improvement of Upper Extremity Among Patients with Stroke , in PGIMER Chandigarh,(2018-20)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/12/022246
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-12-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G998- Other specified disorders of nervous system in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: CONVENTIONAL MIRROR THERAPY , APP BASED MIRROR THERAPY: Providing Stroke Rehablitation Of Upper Extrimity Using Mirror Therapy both Demonstration method And app based Teaching de

Sponsors

PGIMER Chandigarh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Patients having hemiplegia due to stroke. 2)Having MMSE SCORE >24. 3)Able to obey commands. 4)Available at the time of data collection. 5)Willing to participate in the study. 6)No history of musculo skeletal injury in the affected upper extremity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients with quadriplegia, and paraplegia due to stroke 2)Having muscle strength of 0 3)Cortical stroke 4) Gait disorders 5)Head injury -Cerebellar ataxia -spinal ataxia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
functional improvements of upper extremitiesTimepoint: 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
activities of daily livingTimepoint: 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDurga Lekshmy UK

National Institute of Nursing Education

manjuseban@gmail.com9855151528

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026