Skip to content

A study to compare the use of Xience stent Vs Supraflex Cruz stent in diabetic Indian population

Ultra-Thin strUt versus XiencE in a Diabetic pOpulation withMulti-Vessel Disease? 2? India Study ((TUXEDO-2-India))

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/11/022088
Enrollment
1800
Registered
2019-11-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: E115- Type 2 diabetes mellitus with circulatory complications

Interventions

Intervention1: Supraflex Cruz Sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system: Supraflex Cruz is the latest generation DES, approved by DCGI and has received CE mark approval in June-2019 in the European Unio

Sponsors

Academics and Research Department Batra Hospital Medical Research Centre
Lead Sponsor
JSS Medical Research Asia Pacific Private Limited
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age greater or equal to 18 years 2.Patient with diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) 3.Angiographically confirmed multivessel CAD [critical (greater or equal to 70 percent) lesions in at least two major epicardial vessels and in at least two separate coronary artery territories (LAD, LCX, RCA]. The population will consist of approximately 85percent patients with triple vessel disease 4.Angiographic characteristics amenable to PCI as decided by the heart team 5.Indication for revascularization based upon symptoms of angina or angina equivalents andor objective evidence of myocardial ischemia 6.Willing to comply with all follow-up required study visits 7.Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Severe congestive heart failure (class III or IV according to NYHA, or pulmonary edema) at the time of enrollment. 2.Prior CABG surgery. 3.Prior PCI with stent implantation within 6 months. 4.Previous stroke within 6 months or patients with stroke at more than 6 months with significant residual neurologic involvement, as reflected in a Rankin Score greater 1. 5.Prior history of significant bleeding (within the previous 6 months) that might preclude use of dual antiplatelet therapy. 6.In-stent restenosis of a target vessel. 7.Two or more chronic total occlusions in major coronary territories that are targeted for revascularization. 8.Acute ST-elevation MI (Q-wave) within 72 hours prior to enrollment requiring revascularization. 9.Contraindication to PCI because of a coexisting clinical condition 10.Intolerance or contraindication to aspirin or both clopidogrel and ticagrelor or prasugrel. 11.Extra-cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years. 12.Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plans to become pregnant while the study. 13.Concurrent enrollment in another clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the ultrathin Supraflex Cruz vs. Xience family when combined with contemporary optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multi vessel disease with respect to target lesion failure (TLF)Timepoint: At 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate whether the pooled cohort from both arms of the study (Supraflex Cruz and Xience family) provides similar clinical outcomes (composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke) to the coronary artery bypass graft surgery based on performance goal derived from the CABG arm of the FREEDOM trial (historical control)Timepoint: up to 5 years.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNagma Khan

Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre

tuxedo2bhmrc@gmail.com9811150518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026