Skip to content

QUALITY OF LIFE AND SURGICAL OUTCOME IN MESH PLACEMENT WITHOUT CLOSING DEFECT AND WITH CLOSURE OF DEFECT IN SMALL AND MEDIUM VENTRAL HERNIA : A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL

QUALITY OF LIFE AND SURGICAL OUTCOME IN IPOM AND IPOM PLUS IN SMALL AND MEDIUM VENTRAL HERNIA : A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/11/021856
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-11-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K432- Incisional hernia without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: compare pain score and quality of life (primary outcome) between IPOM and IPOM PLUS: The laparoscopic intraperitonealonlay mesh (IPOM) technique In IPOM PLUS hernia defect will be clos

Sponsors

AIIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All Patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery with defect of less than equal to 5 cm 2. Patients who gave consent for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with defect size more than5 cm. 2. Patients with recurrent ventral hernia 3. Patients who do not give consent for participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
a. To assess quality of life by Carolinas comfort scale in IPOM and IPOM plus in small and medium ventral hernia. b. to compare postoperative pain by VAS in IPOM and IPOM plus Timepoint: 3 ,6 AND 12 MONTH

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To study various post operative complications in IPOM and IPOM plus 1. Pain 2. Infection 3. Seroma 4. Bulging 5. recurrence Timepoint: 1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR YASHWANT SINGH RATHORE

AIIMS

dryashvant.r@gmail.com9911337726

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026