FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative study of breathing through new intraoral (fits inside mouth) mask versus that by using the usual face mask during starting of general anaesthesia

Comparative evaluation of ventilation using intraoral mask and conventional face mask

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/11/021848
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-11-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: NUMASK: INTRAORAL MASK Applied orally (between lips and gums) , only once , for a duration of two minites Control Intervention1: conventional face mask: conventional silicon face mask o

Sponsors

MAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I,II,III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ANTICIPATED DIFFICULT INTUBATION 2. ANTICIPATED DIFFICULT MASK VENTILATION AS INDICATED BY BEARDED PATIENTS, EDENTULOUS, MORBID OBESITY, HISTORY OF SNORING, OBESITY 3. PATIENTS WITH HIGH ASPIRATION RISK (GERD, PREGNANCY)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
DIFFERENCE IN EXPIRED MINUTE VOLUME DELIVERED BY TWO TYPE OF MASKSTimepoint: AT THE TIME OF EXPIRATION OF EACH BREATH—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. ETCO2 2. ANY SIGN OF TRAUMA TO LIPS, GUMS OR TEETHTimepoint: 3-4 MINUTES—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr UC VERMA

MAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE

ucverma2k@gmail.com9868604211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026