FindTrial
Sign In

To assess the intubation characteristics with a video laryngosocpe ( both channeled blade and non chanelled blade) and conventional laryngosocpe in a mannequin by a medical student

COMPARISION OF King vision Videolaryngoscope channeled and non-channeled blades with direct laryngoscope for intubation in mannequin by medical students: a randomized mannequin study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/10/021682
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-10-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: King vision channeled blade: Intubation with King vision channeled blade. The skill will be reassessed after 1 month. Intervention2: King vision channeled blade: Intubation with King

Sponsors

AIIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All medical students fifth semester onwards

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: prior experience with laryngosocpes studied

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of tracheal intubation attemptsTimepoint: at time zero and after 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the rate of successful placement of the tracheal tube in the trachea.Timepoint: Rate of successful intubation will be assessed after completion of 2 successful intubations for each participant.;To evalute the functionality and operative satisfaction of all three laryngoscope using Visual analogue scale.Timepoint: At the end of each scenario, each participant will score the ease of use of each device—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNishkarsh Gupta

AIIMS, Delhi

drnishkarsh@rediffmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026