Skip to content

Epidural anaesthesia technique for lower limb orthopedic surgeries

A comparative evaluation of dural puncture epidural technique versus conventional epidural technique for lower limb orthopedic surgeries.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/10/021650
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-10-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S822- Fracture of shaft of tibia

Interventions

Intervention1: Epidural anaesthesia: Epidural anaesthesia will be given via dural puncture epidural technique and conventional epidural technique using 1.5% Inj lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 2 Lakh

Sponsors

Dr RPGMC Kangra at Tanda
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA-1 and ASA-2 undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient with bleeding disorders On anticoagulants or with local or systemic infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare onset of analgesia with dural puncture epidural technique with the conventional epidural technique.Timepoint: 24hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of side effects as nausea, vomiting, hypotension and see for complications if any.Timepoint: 24hours

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactIsha Badhan

Dr. RPGMC Tanda

versha2u@yahoo.co.in9418152286

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026