FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Endotracheal intubation between video laryngoscopy(McGrath) and direct laryngoscopy in children.

Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope with conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients with normal airway.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/10/021568
Enrollment
88
Registered
2019-10-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K561- Intussusception

Interventions

Intervention1: Video Laryngoscope assisted Intubation: Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope with conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients with normal airw

Sponsors

SSG HospitalVadodara
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. 2.Age: 01 to 05yrs 3.Weight: 10-20kg 4.Gender: Either gender. 5.ASA I & II 6.Mouth opening >20 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with expected difficult airway intubation 2.Patients with congenital anomaly 3.Upper respiratory tract infection 4.Preexisting laryngeal or tracheal pathology 5.Patientâ??s parents/guardian not willing for participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total Interval Time for intubation (in seconds)Timepoint: Total Interval Time for intubation (in seconds)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Glottic Exposure time Number of attempts of devise insertion Number of attempts of tube insertion Intubation Difficulty Scale Vital parameters ComplicationsTimepoint: Glottic Exposure time—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Devyani Desai

S.S.G. HOSPITAL

devyani.dr@gmail.com9909983168

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026