FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISION OF SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT IMPLANT HEALING ABUTMENTS TITANIUM , ZIRCONIA AND PEEKâ?? â?? AN INVIVO STUDY

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE TO THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF IMPLANT HEALING ABUTMENTS - TITANIUM, ZIRCONIUM AND PEEK â?? AN INVIVO STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/10/021550
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-10-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: soft tissue changes around PEEK healing abutment, titanium healing abutment and zirconia healing abutment.: 15 partially edentulous patients would be selected for the study wher

Sponsors

Samudrala Tejaswini
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: No history of previous implant loss, major pathology or irradiation. Requirements for implant placement include sufficient bone width and height.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Insufficient bone volume at the recipient sites for placement of an implant. Active infection or severe inflammation in the areas intended for implant placement. Patients with any existing systemic diseases. Alcohol or drug abuse. Smoking. Pregnancy and lactation

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
healing of the soft tissues with three abutmentsTimepoint: Three months following implant installation—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Response and health of soft tissue towards three different types of healing abutments Titanium, Zirconia and PEEK are sameTimepoint: 3 months after implant installation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactTejaswini

kamineni institute of dental sciences

anulekhaavinash@gmail.com8121319805

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026