â??A Comparative Evaluation Of 2.0 mm Titanium Mini Plates And 3D Titanium Locking Plates In Mandibular Osteosynthesis- A Randomised Clinical Prospective Studyâ??

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/09/021418

Enrollment

Registered

2019-09-25

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R65- Symptoms and signs specifically associated with systemic inflammation and infection

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D locking titanium miniplates ,2.0 mm conventional titanium miniplates.: 2mm with locking screws Control Intervention1: Not applicable: Not applicable

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with symphysis and parasymphysis mandibular fractures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who refuses to give consent. Patients with infected fractures. Communited fractures. Atrophic mandible. Pathological fractures. ASA III & IV.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In primary outcomes it was noted that 3D plates used in patients gives increase stability, decreases time duration of surgery.Timepoint: 1 year	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
in secondary outcomes it was noted that the bite force increase in the patients treated with 3D plates after 1 week of surgery. post op pain was minimal.Timepoint: 1.5 years	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Akash Bhatt

Institute of dental studies & technologies

akashbhatt2005@gmail.com8265826384

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026