Skip to content

Laser treatment of lichen planus pigmentosus and pigmented contact dermatitis.

Efficacy and safety of low fluence Q-switched Nd-YAG laser for the treatment of facial lichen planus pigmentosus or pigmented contact dermatitis: a prospective randomized control study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/09/021361
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-09-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L818- Other specified disorders of pigmentation

Interventions

Intervention1: Group 1 (laser arm): Fortnightly Q Switched Nd Yag Laser (Med-lite C6 Hoya Con Bio Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) with a fluence 2.0 J/cm2, spot size 6 mm, frequency 10 Hz and 10 to 20 passes

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sceinces
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All consecutive patients of lichen planus pigmentosus and pigmented contact dermatitis fulfilling following criteria: 1. 18-50 years of age 2. no progression of pigmentation for past 3 months 3. histologically inactive (defined as absence of interface dermatitis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age 2. Coexistent active lichen planus 3. Previous history of laser treatment during the last 12 months 4. Patients on systemic or topical therapy for the past 1 month 5. Not willing to participate in the study 6. Patients having photosensitivity 7. Patients with hypersensitivity to prilocaine or lignocaine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Physician assessment: Two dermatologists blinded to the treatment protocol would independently assess pigment lightening using digital photographs with the following grading scale. o 0-25% (none/ slightly lightening) o 26-50% (moderate lightening) o 51-75% (significant lightening) o 76-95% (very good lightening) o 96-100% (excellent lightening) Also a comparison of side effects in the two groups will be done at the end of trial.Timepoint: 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Dermoscopic assessment: The changes in dermoscopy will be compared before and after treatment. Timepoint: 24 weeks;Histopathological assessment: To compare the pigment reduction in pre and post treatment biopsies. Timepoint: 24 weeks;Patient assessment: Patientâ??s subjective assessment will be noted on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10, (0 - worst and 10 - best results) Timepoint: 24 weeks;Quality of life assessment: patients will be asked to fill Dermatology quality of life questionnaire (DLQI) at the beginning and the end of study, to measure the impact on quality of life with intervention. Timepoint: 24 weeks;Spectrophotometric assessment: Mean change in MI and EI will be calculated in each arm at every month and compared. Timepoint: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr G Sethuraman

All India Instiute of Medical Sciences

aiimsgsr@gmail.com011-26593217

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026