Skip to content

Comparison of patient comfort during airway Ultrasound between Nasal versus Oral Route.

Comparison of patient comfort during Endobronchial Ultrasound between Nasal versus Oral Route(EUNOR)â??A Prospective Randomized Control study - EUNOR Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/09/021298
Enrollment
62
Registered
2019-09-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J985- Diseases of mediastinum, not elsewhere classified Health Condition 2: C348- Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of bronchus and lung Health Condition 3: A188- Tuberculosis of other specified organs

Interventions

Intervention1: EBUS(Endobronchial Ultrasound) Oral Versus Nasal Route: After taking informed consent in their own language and preliminary investigations, patients shall be randomized equally into the

Sponsors

AIIMS Jodhpur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients who have clear indication of EBUS procedure will be enrolled in the study. 2. Patients who give consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who will not give consent and who have contraindications to Bronchoscopy / Endobronchial Ultrasound e.g. Uncooperative patient, refractory hypoxemia, unstable cardiaovascular status, facial deformity, recent/unstable angina, myocardial infarction within last 6 weeks, arrhythmias, bleeding disorders, uremia, etc will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare patient comfort during Endobronchial Ultrasound via nasal route and Oral routes. 2.To compare failure rate of EBUS procedure in both the groups. Timepoint: During, after intubation and after 2 hours of procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess operator satisfaction (VAS) between the two groups. 2.To assess willingness to return for the procedure. 3.Comparison of NAPCOM scores. 4.Comparison of cough count between the two procedure.(VAS) 5.Comparison of Overall duration to reach in sub-glottic area. 6.To compare mean dose of topical anaesthetic requirement. 7.To measure difference of intravenous analgesic/ sedative requirement between the two groups 8. To compare complications rate between two groups. Timepoint: During, after intubation and after 2 hours of procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRam Niwas

AIIMS Jodhpur

drrniwas@gmail.com9999493179

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026