Health Condition 1: M959- Acquired deformity of musculoskeletal system, unspecified Health Condition 2: G969- Disorder of central nervous system, unspecified Health Condition 3: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 4: N39- Other disorders of urinary system Health Condition 5: V99- Unspecified transport accident
Conditions
Interventions
Control Intervention1: Intubation qualities of three different laryngoscopes namely Smarttrach,CMAC and Mcintosh: Comparing the intubation characteristics while using three different laryngoscope blad
Sponsors
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA I and II patients undergoing elective surgery
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal Anticipated Difficult Airway ( Mallampatti Class III and IV, thyromental distance and inter-incisor distance Obesity( BMI >35) Increased intracranial pressure or cervical spine diseases cardiovascular disease endocrine disease presence of risk factors for gastric aspiration e.g. pregnancy, diabetes, etc
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary:Compare the success rates and time for intubation (i.e the time in seconds from insertion of laryngoscopes to the appearance of square wave on capnogram) Secondary:1) CL grading, need of optimization maneuvers, no.of attempts for successful placement, haemodynamic responses, Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) scale, subjective ease of intubation 2) Complications like injury to the lips, teeth or tongue and any blood stain on the device Timepoint: ( the time in seconds from insertion of laryngoscopes to the appearance of square wave on capnogram) Secondary:1) CL grading, need of optimization maneuvers, no.of attempts for successful placement, haemodynamic responses, Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) scale, subjective ease of intubation 2) Complications like injury to the lips, teeth or tongue and any blood stain on the device | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1) CL grading, need of optimization maneuvers, no.of attempts for successful ET placement, haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy, Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) scale, subjective ease of intubation (VAS) 2) Complications like injury to the lips, teeth or tongue and any blood stain on the device Timepoint: - | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactRudrashish Haldar
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed