Haemodynamic derangements during laryngoscopy using different intubating devices

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY FOR COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HAEMODYNAMIC DERANGEMENTS USING VLSCOPE (VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE), LIGHT WAND AND CONVENTIONAL MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE AS INTUBATING DEVICES IN ADULT SURGICAL PATIENTS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/09/021176

Enrollment

Registered

2019-09-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: A00-B99- Certain infectious and parasitic diseases Health Condition 2: H60-H95- Diseases of the ear and mastoid process Health Condition 3: H00-H59- Diseases of the eye and adnexa Health Condition 4: N00-N99- Diseases of the genitourinary system Health Condition 5: M00-M99- Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue Health Condition 6: E00-E89- Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases Health Condition 7: C00-D49- Neoplasms

Interventions

Intervention1: VLSCOPE: VLSCOPE - Video Laryngoscope Control Intervention1: Light Wand: Light Wand- Illuminating lightened stylet Control Intervention2: Macintosh Laryngoscope: Coventional Larygnscopy

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Weight (40-70 kgs) ASA Grade I and II Patients posted for Elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with previous history of multiple/failed intubation Patient with predicted difficult laryngoscopy (except for MP Grade III and IV) Patient with known or suspected cardiovascular derangement Patients with any pathology of oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device Mouth openning of less than 2.5 cm Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurtitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (Hiatus Hernia)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the haemodynamic changes i.e. HR , MABP and RPP using VLSCOPE, Light wand and Macintosh LaryngoscopeTimepoint: 4 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken for intubation Success rate of intubation Number of attempts taken for intubation Number of adjustment maneuvers needed for successfull intubation Grade the ease of intubation in three different devices Record the evidence of airway trauma Document the incidence of sore throat in postoperative periodTimepoint: 4 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactZoya Khan

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, AMU, Aligarh

qaziehsanali@gmail.com9045460062

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026